Thursday, April 30, 2020
The Source Of The Many Differences Between Mesopotamia And Egypt Can B
  The source of the many differences between Mesopotamia and Egypt can be found in the  geographic locations of these civilizations. Egypt, protected by natural barriers on all sides,  remained uninfluenced for many years. Not many other civilizations came in contact with the    Egyptian people. Thus, they developed much differently politically and socially compared to    Mesopotamia. Mesopotamia was constantly invaded by foreigners who would incorporate their  culture into their newly conquered society and form a new one by force. It is no surprise then  that the two civilizations would end up with completely different ideas about the world.    Egypt's social structure consisted of the pharaoh, priests, farmers, merchants, and  craftsmen. The pharaoh was the "God-King". Not only did he govern Egypt, but he was an  immortal (or a god). Pharaohs were believed to be gods who had chosen to live on earth for a  time. These immortal men were highly respected by Egyptian people because of their godly  powers. "The pharaoh's will was law, and his wisdom all-knowing" (Adler,1996,26). Because  the gods spoke through the pharaoh, his regulations and laws were to be carried out without  question. Otherwise the gods would "cease to smile upon Egypt".    Priests were important to Egyptians but were not terribly powerful (like they were in    Mesopotamia). They merely enforced religious beliefs and helped the king when he was  unpopular. The Free tenant farmers, who worked on estates owned by a landowner or  government official, constituted the majority of the population. These farmers worked on this  granted land in order to provide service to the crown (the pharaoh). Their life, like the Egyptians  of higher and lower classes, was extremely stable and predictable. They usually resided in  crowded villages that stretched across the Nile River. In these villages, the merchants and  craftsmen could also be found, but Egypt had no real cities. The capital cities in Egypt served as  royal palaces for the wealthy or for social entertainment. The majority of the population had  nothing to do with these cities, except to act as a labor force. Unlike many other civilizations, the  cities of Egypt were not used as major trade or control centers among villages. Trade and  commerce were of little importance to Egyptians.    On the other hand, Mesopotamia was a huge collection of many cultures. Numerous  amounts of foreigners invaded and forced their beliefs and ideas upon the Mesopotamians. All of  this cultural influence produced many rapid changes and caused extreme instability. Rulers were  not gods, were not as well respected, and had to fight for their control. Mesopotamians did not  experience the security that Egyptians had. The economy way under constant stress because of  the taxes needed to support an army. Armies were of extreme importance in order to prevent  further invasions and to squelch frequent rebellions that occurred. The isolated Egyptians never  had to raise an army or set any heavy taxes. Mesopotamians though, because of the number of  invaders, had many cities and trade centers. The variety of people within the cities produced  many cultural achievements and advances. They had well developed road systems to improve  communication and enforce government control in surrounding villages. They, under the    Phoenicians, developed a water-based trade system that reached as far as Great Britain. By sea,  they traded information, dyes, and metals such as copper and iron. Because of their exposure to  many different ideas, Mesopotamians were very influential in the ancient world and are still  today.    As for the Egyptians, their ideas vanished with the disappearance of their civilizations.    Their natural barriers separated them from the harsh realities around them. They were stable and  were not subjected to invasions by foreigners for many centuries. This provided a false sense of  security. They took very little measures to prevent a disastrous invasion from occurring. Egypt  was not prepared militarily; they had little trained soldiers and very few advanced weapons.    Egyptians trusted that the gods were responsible for their long reign without any outside threats.    They believed that "the Gods smiled on Egypt", and they also took this to mean that they were  superior to any other cultures. The only "real" people were Egyptian people and anyone else was  considered inferior. This egotistical view resulted in a limited trade of knowledge because  foreigners had little to offer the superior Egyptians. Thus, they did not advance scientifically,  mathematically, or militarily like the Mesopotamians had. This feeling of superiority eventually  resulted in their defeat when invaders finally did come.    The experiences of the Mesopotamians and Egyptians were very different because of their  location. Egyptians    
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)